
As many submissions as possible should be sent. planningNSW will count submissions for and against the plant and consider comments made. Both the counts and the quality of comments are important. If you don't want to make detailed comments then at least consider putting in a simple submission objecting to the plant. Detailed information to help with your submissions is available below.
Send your submission(s) to planningNSW at the address below. Form letters are not appropriate - individual letters need to be written. Submissions do not need to be long or detailed, for example, you could simply register your objection to the proposed placement of the plant (click here for other examples) - but any objection must include reason(s). If you do not want your submission to be made available to the applicant (Australian Silicon Pty Ltd), please state this in your submission.
Note: A letter from Roger Wilkins, Director General of the Cabinet Office NSW, 15/1/02 stated that The Premier has requested that Minister Refshauge treat our petitions as EIS submissions.
It would be appreciated it if you would send the Charcoalition a copy of your submission.
Also consider sending your submission to the media
Guidelines for Making a Submission (from the EIS document)
Submissions should include:
So that the matters raised in submissions can be analysed and
properly considered it
is preferable to:
All information in representations received may be published in subsequent assessment documents. Where the supplier indicates at the time of supply of information that it should be kept confidential, planningNSW will attempt to keep it confidential but there may be legislative or legal justification for the release of the information. For example, under the Freedom of information Act 1989 or under subpoena or statutory instrument.
Scott Jeffries
Development and Infrastructure Assessment
planningNSW
GPO Box 3927
Sydney NSW 2001
Henry Deane Building
20 Lee Street
Sydney 2000
Or by e-mail to information@planning.nsw.gov.au
| List of issues from Charcoalition |
| Comments on the Charcoal Plant EIS by R.M. Rabbidge |
| Comments on the Charcoal Plant EIS by David Mackenzie |
| Health impacts by Kathryn Maxwell |
| Water Issues and the Mogo Charcoal Plant by Emmett O'Loughlin |
| Dioxins and Furans - notes from David Mackenzie |
| Flora & Fauna surveys - notes from David Mackenzie |
| EIS Assessment by Eurobodalla Shire Council staff (PDF file). |
| Using poison trees in the charcoal plant: Poisoned trees 'waste' for charcoal plant Canberra Sunday Times Impacts of burning - letter by Frank Stanton Tordon - notes by David Mackenzie |
| Making easy submissions |
| Bob Carr's speech at the opening of the Eurobodalla Botanic Gardens 1 September 2001. MUST READ! |
| Safety of the Kings Highway - NRMA report |
| Charcoal site not studied - Nye by Heather Tindale |
| The degradation of native riparian vegetation along New South Wales water courses - a new Key Threatening Process: |
|
Alternative methods - see CSIRO alternatives and a new method requiring no carbon reductant Also see a poster on an alternative process using Ultra Clean Coal PDF [help!] |
| BROULEE CHARCOAL FACTORY MERCURY TOXICITY RISK |
| NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service EIS Submission |
|
The
Effects of Proximity to the Charcoal Plant on Resident's Social
Values "A University of Wollongong study by Sociology students has revealed that 74 percent of residents in the region are opposed to the charcoal plant in the Shire and that the proximity to the site has an effect on people's overall social and political values. The closer they live, the more likely they are to be opposed to the plant." |