ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
SUBMISSION DATA

This section of the web site contains information to assist you in writing submissions on the EIS

| How & When | Useful information | Easy submissions |

THE CLOSING DATE HAS PASSED

SUBMISSIONS - HOW & WHEN

As many submissions as possible should be sent. planningNSW will count submissions for and against the plant and consider comments made. Both the counts and the quality of comments are important. If you don't want to make detailed comments then at least consider putting in a simple submission objecting to the plant. Detailed information to help with your submissions is available below.

Send your submission(s) to planningNSW at the address below. Form letters are not appropriate - individual letters need to be written. Submissions do not need to be long or detailed, for example, you could simply register your objection to the proposed placement of the plant (click here for other examples) - but any objection must include reason(s). If you do not want your submission to be made available to the applicant (Australian Silicon Pty Ltd), please state this in your submission.

Note: A letter from Roger Wilkins, Director General of the Cabinet Office NSW, 15/1/02 stated that The Premier has requested that Minister Refshauge treat our petitions as EIS submissions.

It would be appreciated it if you would send the Charcoalition a copy of your submission.

Also consider sending your submission to the media

Guidelines for Making a Submission (from the EIS document)
Submissions should include:

So that the matters raised in submissions can be analysed and properly considered it
is preferable to:


Note: It states in Appendix B, Statutory Requirements for the Preparation of an EIS -
"Attention is also drawn to clause 283 of the Regulation [Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000] regarding false and misleading statements in the EIS".
 
In your submissions, make specific reference to any statement in the EIS that you feel is false or misleading in an important respect.

All information in representations received may be published in subsequent assessment documents. Where the supplier indicates at the time of supply of information that it should be kept confidential, planningNSW will attempt to keep it confidential but there may be legislative or legal justification for the release of the information. For example, under the Freedom of information Act 1989 or under subpoena or statutory instrument.

Your submission(s) must be received by planningNSW
by close of business 16 January 2002

Scott Jeffries
Development and Infrastructure Assessment
planningNSW
GPO Box 3927
Sydney NSW 2001

Henry Deane Building
20 Lee Street
Sydney 2000

Or by e-mail to information@planning.nsw.gov.au


Information you can use in your submission

List of issues from Charcoalition
Comments on the Charcoal Plant EIS by R.M. Rabbidge
Comments on the Charcoal Plant EIS by David Mackenzie
Health impacts by Kathryn Maxwell
Water Issues and the Mogo Charcoal Plant by Emmett O'Loughlin
Dioxins and Furans - notes from David Mackenzie
Flora & Fauna surveys - notes from David Mackenzie
EIS Assessment by Eurobodalla Shire Council staff (PDF file).
Using poison trees in the charcoal plant:
  Poisoned trees 'waste' for charcoal plant Canberra Sunday Times
  Impacts of burning - letter by Frank Stanton
  Tordon - notes by David Mackenzie
Making easy submissions
Bob Carr's speech at the opening of the Eurobodalla Botanic Gardens 1 September 2001. MUST READ!
Safety of the Kings Highway - NRMA report
Charcoal site not studied - Nye by Heather Tindale
The degradation of native riparian vegetation along New South Wales water courses - a new Key Threatening Process:

Alternative methods - see CSIRO alternatives and a new method requiring no carbon reductant

Also see a poster on an alternative process using Ultra Clean Coal PDF [help!]

 BROULEE CHARCOAL FACTORY MERCURY TOXICITY RISK
NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service EIS Submission 

The Effects of Proximity to the Charcoal Plant on Resident's Social Values
(PDF file 329Kb)
by University of Wollongong Sociology Students Jennifer Moraga, Anne Richardson and Simone Everet

"A University of Wollongong study by Sociology students has revealed that 74 percent of residents in the region are opposed to the charcoal plant in the Shire and that the proximity to the site has an effect on people's overall social and political values. The closer they live, the more likely they are to be opposed to the plant." 



When finished reading this page, click here if you came directly to it to go to the Charcoalition main page.
Otherwise just close this window

© The Coastwatchers Association Inc. 2001
Contact Web manager